Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Developing biocultural indicators for resource management

Abstract : Resource management and conservation interventions are increasingly embracing social–ecological systems (SES) concepts. While SES frameworks recognize the connectedness of humans and nature, many fail to acknowledge the complex role of sociocultural factors in influencing people's interactions with the environment. As such, when indicators in SES frameworks are used to measure the social dimen- sion, easy to measure, socioeconomic indicators are the norms, while more com- plex social and cultural indicators are rare. To develop meaningful indicators of resilience in SES we need to understand local definitions of resilience. In this paper we describe methods used in a biocultural approach to illuminate sociocultural fac- tors that Pacific Islanders identify as important for resilient communities. We focus specifically on two dimensions of sociocultural factors, “Connectedness to People and Place” and “Indigenous and local knowledges, skills, practices, values and worldviews,” which relate to many interventions, but are not usually monitored. We offer examples of indicators that may be appropriate to measure under these dimensions. Increased use of biocultural indicators will bring additional insight on the types and combinations of indicators that work best in given contexts.
Complete list of metadatas
Contributor : Dorian Miler <>
Submitted on : Wednesday, June 5, 2019 - 2:29:16 PM
Last modification on : Wednesday, October 7, 2020 - 10:04:28 AM

Links full text



Rachel Dacks, Tamara Ticktin, | Mawyer, Sophie Caillon, Joachim Claudet, et al.. Developing biocultural indicators for resource management. Conservation Science and Practice, 2019, 1 (6), pp.e38. ⟨10.1111/csp2.38⟩. ⟨hal-02148372⟩



Record views